Skip to main content

What To Do With Greyhounds?

RTÉ recently aired a documentary entitled "RTÉ Investigates: Greyhounds Running For Their Lives", which looked at malpractices in the greyhound industry, the economy of the greyhound racing , and the euthanising of greyhounds. There were scenes in the documentary that distressed some viewers, and angered them at the thoughts of taxpayers' money propping up the industry, and sparked protests outside greyhound stadiums.

But while some of scenes were simply undefendable, others need more clarification, which I hope to look at in this piece. The title of this article is not a rhetorical question, there needs to be answers to the questions posed following the documentary, some of which I hope to shed some light on. This article isn't about taking sides in an argument about the programme, but rather to look at what can be done to reform the industry, and what really happens with greyhounds who no longer make the cut.

One major talking point on social media following the documentary, was the €16.8m that "taxpayers" give to the greyhound industry. While this statement is technically true, it failed to mention that those taxpayers are in fact exclusively those who gamble, not the ordinary taxpayer. The funding comes from the betting levy, not VAT, PAYE, or any other form of tax, so this means that the government funding given to the Irish Greyhound Board/ Bord na gCon is at least partially accumulated by the IGB itself.

On top of this the IGB generated roughly €8m last year for charities, including the charity for retired greyhounds. Along with supporting many sports clubs who host charity events at racenights, the IGB along with Limerick businessman JP McManus, host the Kirby Cup every year, a racing tournament that sees GAA clubs allocated a dog, and whichever dog wins, the GAA club receives a prize. In 2019 the top prize was €10,000.

Greyhound racing is a big industry, in 2017 it was responsible for over 5,000 jobs, paid €12.7m in PAYE and PRSI, and had an economic impact of over €300m. This makes the €16.8m in funds from the betting levy which it generates, quite insignificant in the bigger picture.

Now that we have discussed the finances, let's look at the animal welfare side. The biggest question I would pose, particularly to those who want the industry outlawed, is what is to be done with the greyhounds when they no longer have a purpose? 16,000 greyhounds are born in Ireland every year, where do they go and what do they do? There aren't 16,000 families looking to adopt greyhounds in Ireland. What seems to be the only solution, were this to happen, would either be euthanising the dogs or exporting them. These are two things that the protesters are protesting against.

Greyhounds are bred to run, even when they get old all they want to do is run, but unfortunately time catches upon them. Sometimes the most humane thing to do is to let them die peacefully. Now not all greyhounds make it to an old age, many are put to sleep once their career is over, but many are also kept for breeding or as a pet by the owner once their racing days are done. Once again money comes into the equation here, when it comes to how dogs are put down. The documentary showed dogs being put down in a knackery, rather than at a vets. While both methods can be distressing for some owners and dogs, both are relatively quick and painless, the main difference is cost. According to the documentary it was roughly €60 cheaper to go to the knackery.

What some people seem to forget is that the animals used to make their burgers and sausages, are put down in a similar way. Seeing it on a TV screen would cause distress in many people regardless of the animal. While I'm sure that the undercover operation would deter many knackeries from continuing the practice, perhaps this is an area where the betting levy could be used to a greater affect. If the IGB or Department of Tourism and Sport subsidised euthanisations  by €30 or €40, it could bring the price of going to the vet down enough to deter people from taking a risk by going to the knackery.

The government and IGB certainly need to take this issue seriously. It has greatly damaged the reputation of the greyhound industry and painted all greyhound owners with the one brush in the eyes of many. Owners caught using knackeries, steroids, or other malpractices should face lengthy bans, even lifetime bans for repeat offenders. It is at least worth trying methods such as increased bans and grants for euthanizing, in order to tackle a problem that clearly exists. In the end the documentary was correct in stating it's a business, but like all businesses you have employers who care for their employees and others who don't. The IGB needs to make sure that all guidelines and laws are adhered to, and that when the time comes for a greyhound to die, it is done so in the best way possible.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's The Beef With Beef ?

The Irish Beef Industry has been going through turbulent times recently, most notably because of the proposed Mercosur deal and the prices farmers receive for their cattle. We haven't even reached Brexit yet, and are still weeks out from the latest withdrawal deadline, and beef farmers are at their wits end. But how has it got to this and can farmers cope if there is a no-deal Brexit? Farmers' incomes are under threat, not just because of the reasons outlined above, but also because of the threat to grants which keep small and medium farms in business. The recent EU elections have seen the status quo remain in the European Parliament, with parties of the right keeping their large dominance of the union. There has been some debate surrounding the EU's agricultural plan over the course of the previous five year parliament, particularly regarding the EU's farm subsidy. Now that the elections are over, the EU government could proceed with plans which could see a standard ...

A 2023 Election Not To Be Ruled Out

  With the Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, Green Party coalition now entering its third year of a maximum five-year term, many are of the opinion that the trio will ride out the rather undesirable polling figures and wait until the last possible moment to call another general election. Another common opinion is that an election will be called in the second half of 2024, how late in that half dependent on the results of the European and Local elections in May of that year. Both valid points, particularly the latter; a bumper budget in October, semi-decent canvassing weather, and pre-empting the inevitable winter healthcare crisis, all make for a workable scenario for the government parties. However, strategically speaking, taking those points and applying them to October 2023 may make more sense for Martin, Varadkar, and Ryan, should they be willing to gamble their final year of the term for the prospects of another five-year stint running Leinster House. Despite current polling having ...

Schrodinger’s Election: Can an election be both good and bad at the same time?

  Two elections took place in Ireland last Friday (Three in Limerick, which also had its first Mayoral Election), but you would be forgiven for thinking that there were in fact four or more. Depending on who you asked, a variety of parties had both a good and bad day at the polls. Unlike Schrodinger’s Cat, the parties remain very much alive, though some more alive than others, with none actually licking their wounds. We knew much of the results of the local elections by Sunday evening, apart from the epic count in Newbridge which saw four re-counts and neither candidate involved being elected. They key result, which we knew on Saturday night, was the national result. By the time the weekend came to an end, we knew that there was a correlation between the local and EU results, in terms of party polling at least. Sinn Féin’s Michelle Gildernew MP conceded a little early, but was quick to change her mind and put herself back in contention for a seat, which she was. Fine Gael leade...