Skip to main content

Direct Provision Needs Major Reform, Not Abolition

Residents of the Irish Direst Provision system have once again been a topic of discussion in the media and social media following yet another case of substandard treatment within the DP system. Unfortunately like previous complaints and protests by residents, there doesn't seem to be any will to address the current issues facing DP in Ireland.

Continuous cases of poor standards of living have led to many liberals calling for its abolition, without any solution as to how Ireland would deal with refugees and migrants, and determining one from the other. Much of the problem with DP at the moment is the many years it takes for this determination to be made, along with the lengthy appeals process which follows many denials of residency. Much of the time this is not down to a lack of work by the Irish institutions, but rather gaining access to information from the country which the refugee has fled, or in some cases the country which the person has resided in prior to Ireland, then making it harder to determine whether it is a refugee or migrant case.

DP only affects those claiming asylum in Ireland, basically that they are fleeing persecution or war, and it is a system to house these people while a decision is made regarding their status. Migrants can apply for residency in Ireland, await approval, then simply come to the country, unless they are EU citizens, in which case they just come whenever they want, due to the freedom of movement between EU states. The system is needed at the present time, unless a viable alternative is put in place, in order to maintain some level of national security and screening of those seeking to live in Ireland.

But the biggest problem affecting DP today is the fact that it has been privatised, and seems to have become more about profit, then about housing people traumatised by war and genocide. In 2018 the Irish taxpayer handed over €72 million to private companies to run what can be substandard DP centres. Mosney Holidays plc, who seem to have had the required experience gained from providing a holiday destination to cater for up to 600 people fleeing war torn countries, having pocketed €136 million between 2002 and 2018. With this much money being spent annually, you would think that there would be a couple of euro lying around to provide enough food for these people.

The DP system is given a great portrayal in the RTÉ series about DP 'Taken Down', written by best-selling author Jo Spain. It reflects on the barrage of complaints made against many DP centres, while delving deeper into a fictional story about a different kind of profiteering from refugees. The author spoke with residents and former residents of DP before writing the script, giving credibility to the fictionalised story.

The arguments surrounding DP are currently liberal vs conservative, while the real argument should be left vs right. Investing in extra staff to speed up the decision process, and nationalising the DP system could allow for a better quality of stay in the country for those claiming asylum, and could save money in the long term. Rather than paying private companies over €70m per year, the money could be invested in hiring more staff and improving conditions, and through bulk-buying for all DP centres rather than individually.

These are the real arguments that need to be had regarding Ireland's DP system. Currently the two main arguments seem to be about whether we should accommodate refugees or Irish people, and whether these people are genuine refugees or migrants. The real argument should be why €72m was handed over to private companies in 2018 to operate what is widely regarded as a poor, and at times inhumane service. It is a system that pays per occupant, thus encouraging companies to cram as many refugees into one place and spend as little as legally allowed, in order to make as much money as possible. If people really have such a problem with refugees coming to Ireland, then why not attend the regular protests held in Shannon Airport which call for a restoration of Irish neutrality. While we may not be directly bombing these people's homes, we are refuelling and protecting the planes that may very well be helping to destroy their homes, making them refugees in the first place. Ireland is not completely blameless when it comes to international acts of terror, we either turn a blind eye, or actively support our part in foreign wars.

I'll finish off with one of my favourite analogies when it comes to migration. A rich man, a poor man, and a foreign man are sitting at a table with 100 buns, the rich man takes 99 of them and turns to the poor man saying "that foreign man is going to take your bun."




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sinn Féin Pre-Election Analysis

  Operating off the recent in-depth RedC poll, while taking other recent polls into account, one thing is certain, Sinn Féin will have a time-machine on the top of their list to Santa if the election isn’t called before Christmas. It seems like it was only yesterday when the party was polling in the mid-30s, reaching a high of 36%, and seemed like a government in waiting if they managed to get some smaller parties and independents on board. What must have been a scramble for candidates to even get within a whiff of a majority, now some tough decisions will have to be made as to whether they will even run a second candidate in some constituencies. Keep in mind that in some constituencies where the polled well in 2020, and were polling very well in polls, such as Donegal, Cavan-Monaghan, and Louth, there were rumours of a third candidate being added in the 5-seater constituencies where they were polling close to 50% of the vote. When once there were talks of 60+ seats, now they...

Putin Brings Term Limits Into Question

Love him, hate him, or simply don't care about him, Vladimir Putin will be allowed to serve as President of Russia for the foreseeable future. But one thing that many sensationalist headlines are ignoring, is that he actually has to be elected to continue in his role as the Russian head of state. Whether you think Russia has fair elections or not, it brings a broader question into the fore; should political term limits even exist? Let’s move west of the Kremlin, and think about this political situation with some leaders who are more favourable to westerners than the beast from the east. Barack Obama was not allowed to run for a third term in office in 2016, ultimately leading to the election of Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton was simply not as likeable as Obama, something that wasn’t helped by the email scandal or her attack on republican supporters that had an affect on the middle ground. Obama, a much more liked public figure, would have surely retained the White House for a thir...

A 2023 Election Not To Be Ruled Out

  With the Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, Green Party coalition now entering its third year of a maximum five-year term, many are of the opinion that the trio will ride out the rather undesirable polling figures and wait until the last possible moment to call another general election. Another common opinion is that an election will be called in the second half of 2024, how late in that half dependent on the results of the European and Local elections in May of that year. Both valid points, particularly the latter; a bumper budget in October, semi-decent canvassing weather, and pre-empting the inevitable winter healthcare crisis, all make for a workable scenario for the government parties. However, strategically speaking, taking those points and applying them to October 2023 may make more sense for Martin, Varadkar, and Ryan, should they be willing to gamble their final year of the term for the prospects of another five-year stint running Leinster House. Despite current polling having ...