Skip to main content

Putin Brings Term Limits Into Question



Love him, hate him, or simply don't care about him, Vladimir Putin will be allowed to serve as President of Russia for the foreseeable future. But one thing that many sensationalist headlines are ignoring, is that he actually has to be elected to continue in his role as the Russian head of state. Whether you think Russia has fair elections or not, it brings a broader question into the fore; should political term limits even exist?

Let’s move west of the Kremlin, and think about this political situation with some leaders who are more favourable to westerners than the beast from the east. Barack Obama was not allowed to run for a third term in office in 2016, ultimately leading to the election of Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton was simply not as likeable as Obama, something that wasn’t helped by the email scandal or her attack on republican supporters that had an affect on the middle ground. Obama, a much more liked public figure, would have surely retained the White House for a third term were he allowed to run.

In Ireland, President Michael D. Higgins, is currently serving his second and final term, after proving to be the most popular candidate by some margin during the 2018 election. Yes, he’s old, but we can’t write off people purely on their age, remember Dev was 90 when he finished his second term in Áras an Uachtaráin. In all likelihood, Michael D. would win a third term in office if he were willing and allowed to run.

Not wanting to turn this article into a list of popular presidents and former presidents from around the world, we’ll move on to the question again, should term limits exist?

From a democratic perspective, nobody should be excluded for running for election, for any reason, at the end of the day democracy is about the will of the people. If a president is running for their fifth term in office, and they receive the support of 50+% of the electorate, then that is the will of the people. By forbidding someone to run for office, it will never be known for sure if the will of the people has been betrayed or followed.

On the other hand, there are some theoretical downsides to not having a term limit. For one, the goalposts could be moved during the president’s term, giving them an advantage. An example of this is in the US where in some states, convicted felons are routinely denied and then granted their supposed ‘right’ to vote. According to the documentary 13th, this is because many felons are black, and 90+% of black people vote for Democrats. So when a Democrat is in power, they can vote; when a Republican is in power they can’t. Again, I want to emphasise that this is not across the entire US.

There is also something known as the ‘Incumbent Advantage’, which means that the person who already holds the office, has an advantage over a newcomer, as they are more well known by their constituency. This is often exaggerated do dissuade challengers, but it does exist to some degree. However it is arguable that party support levels and the state of the economy play a much larger role in elections, and after all aren’t all elections based on the state of economic and social issues, rather than incumbency?

Terms limits seem to be here for the long-haul, but should they be?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's The Beef With Beef ?

The Irish Beef Industry has been going through turbulent times recently, most notably because of the proposed Mercosur deal and the prices farmers receive for their cattle. We haven't even reached Brexit yet, and are still weeks out from the latest withdrawal deadline, and beef farmers are at their wits end. But how has it got to this and can farmers cope if there is a no-deal Brexit? Farmers' incomes are under threat, not just because of the reasons outlined above, but also because of the threat to grants which keep small and medium farms in business. The recent EU elections have seen the status quo remain in the European Parliament, with parties of the right keeping their large dominance of the union. There has been some debate surrounding the EU's agricultural plan over the course of the previous five year parliament, particularly regarding the EU's farm subsidy. Now that the elections are over, the EU government could proceed with plans which could see a standard ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sinn Féin Pre-Election Analysis

  Operating off the recent in-depth RedC poll, while taking other recent polls into account, one thing is certain, Sinn Féin will have a time-machine on the top of their list to Santa if the election isn’t called before Christmas. It seems like it was only yesterday when the party was polling in the mid-30s, reaching a high of 36%, and seemed like a government in waiting if they managed to get some smaller parties and independents on board. What must have been a scramble for candidates to even get within a whiff of a majority, now some tough decisions will have to be made as to whether they will even run a second candidate in some constituencies. Keep in mind that in some constituencies where the polled well in 2020, and were polling very well in polls, such as Donegal, Cavan-Monaghan, and Louth, there were rumours of a third candidate being added in the 5-seater constituencies where they were polling close to 50% of the vote. When once there were talks of 60+ seats, now they...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recall and No Confidence

  By the time you are reading this, it is likely that California Governor Gavin Newsom will either have survived a recall election, or will have been removed as Governor. But the timing of the election, the same day as Irish Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Coveney faces what is almost certain to be an unsuccessful motion of no confidence, and it begs the question, ‘Should Ireland have a recall process?’ For those unaware of the process, following incompetence or scandal (Governor Newsom was caught breaking his own COVID rules, sound familiar?), the minimum of 12% of the California electorate signed a petition to hold a recall election, which is composed of two parts. Firstly will Newsom stay or go, which requires 50% approval (he was elected with 62% of the vote), and if the electorate choose for him to go, then Part II of the ballot will come into effect, who will replace him? A motion of no confidence usually requires the government of the day to turn against one of their ow...
Post a Comment
Read more